Foreign government code reviews 'problematic'-White House cyber...

The tech isn't being used by real people — yet
There's already a burgeoning underground industry for human-written fake reviews. If you know where to look and have some cash in the bank, you can pay people to write positive reviews for your business — or negative ones for your rivals.

But pointing to their own review, they told me, "it doesn't appear to be the sheer use of Facebook, but rather how an individual interacts with and interprets content on Facebook that affects mental health," they write.

The details:
 According to seven existing studies, people who experienced greater social connection from using Facebook reported less anxiety, but using Facebook exacerbated anxiety for people (in this case, students) who spent the most time on the site. Using Facebook for social connection can lead to positive mental health outcomes, but using it without feeling any social connection while you're doing it can be bad for your mental well-being. But for people who find social connection via Facebook, it could reduce anxiety. One study found that people might feel less anxious while using Facebook because they didn't have to interact with people face-to-face. "Face-to-face interactions may arouse more anxiety and Facebook is subsequently utilized to compensate for this fear," the researchers write in the review, meaning the social networking site could be a coping strategy for people with preexisting anxiety, the researchers note. Anxiety
The big picture: 
Facebook use could trigger or exacerbate anxiety for some people, including those who are already suffer from anxiety issues. But to make things more complicated, a different study found "social use of Facebook related to increased social anxiety.

The details:
 If people found social support on Facebook, they reported lower depressive symptoms. That also applied to users who tended toward neuroticism, ruminative behavior and social comparison. More depressive symptoms were associated with specific metrics like time spent on the site or negative status updates.

I love the taster menu, everything is amazing on it. Easily my favorite Italian restaurant. Sadly it has become more widely known and becoming difficult to get a reservation for prime times. I suggest the carpaccio and the asparagus.

13 billion people actively using the service daily," researchers Rachel L. Rickwood, PhD, from the University of Canberra, Australia write
in their review, published in the journal Computers in Human Behavior.   "On the one hand, it provides a platform for social connection and belongingness, a core need for human beings," they write in the review.

While an attacker might previously have to pay significant sums for high-quality reviews (between $1 and $10 per review on Yelp), they can now generate thousands free of charge, and space them out so they don't attract suspicion — drastically increasing the threat that fake reviews pose.

The details:
 The researchers looked at five existing articles related to addictive Facebook use, which they describe
 as "compulsive or habitual" use that can cause "negative personal outcomes. " All of the studies compared addictive use to general use, defined by amount of time spent on the platform, frequency of logins and number of Facebook friends. Meaning addictive use was linked to worse mental health outcomes, but using Facebook at all could eventually lead to addictive behavior. But it's a complicated relationship, as general use was shown to be a "precursor to addictive use," according to the review.

"The information loss incurred during the training would propagate to the generated text," the researchers wrote, "leading to statistically detectable difference in the underlying character distribution between the generated text and human text.

HPE has said the inspection process was necessary to obtain certification from Russia's Federal Service for Technical and Export Control (FSTEC), a defense agency tasked with countering cyber espionage, in order to sell software in Russia. The review of ArcSight's code was conducted by Echelon, a company with close ties to the Russian military, on behalf of FSTEC, according to Russian regulatory records and interviews with people with direct knowledge of the issue.

WASHINGTON, Oct 3 (Reuters) - Allowing foreign governments to require reviews of software secrets of technology products built by U. companies is "problematic," the top White House cyber security official said on Tuesday, adding that the increasingly common arrangements presented both security and intellectual property risks.

military to a cyber attack. Cyber security experts, former U. intelligence officials and former ArcSight employees said the practice could help Moscow discover weaknesses in the software, potentially helping attackers to blind the U.

My family and I are huge fans of this place. Ice cream topped with fruit is delicious too. The chicken is very good and the garlic sauce is perfect. The staff is super nice and the food is great.Once you have chosen the best elliptical trainer for you, you will be well on your way to achieving your fitness goals. Make sure that you purchase your elliptical trainer from a reputable company, with a good warranty.

When I'm not in headphone reviewer mode, that's the stuff I go for, so it works. If a track emphasizes bass, it's going to be big and bumping. It's not that the highs aren't crisp or detailed — they are, and impressively so — it's just that the lows are that massive. What this means is that the Xiaomis are very fun with electronic, hip-hop, and poppier rock, and absolutely not for purists. If it doesn't, the lower bits are still going to get a boost.

But now Taleb wants more than just vindication: he wants long-term intellectual respect. - drew their appeal from being more narrowly focused on the failures of economists and financial traders to understand the game they were in. He makes a great play in this book of denigrating those earlier volumes as somehow lesser versions of his big idea. If I may be forgiven a heuristic of my own, it is a very bad sign when authors start to look down on the books that connected them to their audience: it means they are now irredeemably up themselves. He says Antifragile
, along with a technical treatise he published before he became famous, are by far his favourite pieces of writing. Their enormous success derived in part from his apparently being proved right by the financial crash of 2007-08
.

And there are some nice lines: "We practitioners and quants aren't too fazed by remarks on the part of academics - it would be like prostitutes listening to technical commentary by nuns. He is good at knockabout invective, laying into "fragilista" economists such as Joseph Stiglitz
and self-aggrandising journalists such as "the vile and harmful" Thomas Friedman
, who was an apologist for the Iraq war. He is now more like the nun with a racy past who lectures the rest of the convent about the meaning of sex: not much fun for anyone. Antifragile
is not all bad: it has flashes of wit and insight. " The problem, though, is that Taleb no longer writes from the perspective of the practitioner but of someone who has crossed over to live among the academics and wants to tell them what they are missing. Taleb says the least antifragile state in the world at the moment is Saudi Arabia, a plausible claim though one it would be nice to see argued out.

, posting a message on their timeline)? , browsing Facebook friend's profiles) explain why some individuals feel depressed after using Facebook compared to those who engage in active use (e. "For example, does passive use of Facebook (e.

Where did you get that? That old saying became poignant to me as I read the next sentence explaining the reason for your correction: